1. What is my thesis?
The Internet real-name system is an inappropriate tool to solve current social problems on cyber space.
2. What types of source am I using to defend my thesis?
I am using Korean Constitution and outcomes of adopting the system.
3. Are my arguments mostly based on evidence, logic or emotion?
My argument is based on logic and evidence such as Korean Constitution and the outcomes. My argument doesn't have any emotions but I think it doesn't matter.
My Confirmation
Yet, the Internet real-name system give us not only positive effects but also some problems. First the Internet real-name system has respects which violate Korean Constitution which under all kinds of establishing laws must follow. Because users' real name is revealed directly there is concerns that their privacy and freedom of expression could be infringed. In this sense, the Internet real-name system violates 'Chapter 2 of the Constitution, Article 17' and 'Chapter 21 of the Constitution, Article 1'. Certainly the system has a principle that users must reveal the real name. And this is not merely violates the Korean Constitution but has serious side effects of easier to hack and personal information leakage. Hence, taking these riscks to deal with current disordered Internet culture and many social issues on cyber space cannot be decided simply since the Internet real-name system is not an effective and appropriate answer to the problematic situation.
댓글 없음:
댓글 쓰기