Classical Argument Outline

Classical Argument Outline

1. The introduction
 I will start by describing the current situation and problems occurring on cyber space. And I will describe the merits of the internet real-name system which is considering as the effective tool to solve those problems on cyber space. Then I will throw the question: Do you really think adopting the internet real-name system is effective to solve these situations on cyber space? By this shifting attention process, I want the readers to reconsider whether the internet real-name system is effective tool or not. And I will and with my thesis, "The Internet real-name system is not effective tool for solving problems occurring on cyber space.

2. The narration
 For my persuasive essay, I should point out the double-sidedeness of Internet real-name system since it is playing most significant role in whether adoting the system or not.

 

3. The confirmation

1. Internet real-name system violates constitution of Korea.
2. Internet real-name system has problem of personal information leakage.
3. It is more easier to hack after adopting Internet real-name system.

4. The refutation and concession
 I will concede that the internet real-name system can be a tool for reducing internet bullying comments. However, unlike argument from pro side that Internet real-name system is efficient to reduce Internet bullying comments, the system reduce the amount of whole comments. Which means it is true that the internet real-name system can a tool for reducing internet bullying comments, but it reduced the amount of whole comments too. 

5. The summation

 I will reimphasize how important it is that we need to distinguish the double0-sidness of Internet real-name system.